It would be a matter of pleasure for Punjab government pensioners to know that Supreme Court has rejected Punjab government appeals / petitions. Through its short order issued on 31 March 2014, The Supreme Court has dismissed as many as 270 appeals / petitions of the Punjab Government against the orders of High Court / Service Tribunal regarding grant of increase in pension on the commuted part of pension, upon restoration of that commuted part.
Year wise numbers of appeals / petitions dismissed is
| Civil Appeals | |||
| From To | Year | Number | |
| 971 | 1017 | 2012 | 47 |
| 289 | 2013 | 1 | |
| 386 | 401 | 16 | |
| 61 | 223 | 2014 | 163 |
| 274 | 1 | ||
| 228 | |||
| Civil Petitions | |||
| 1040 | 2013 | 1 | |
| 1049 | 1 | ||
| 1070 | 1 | ||
| 46 | 58 | 2014 | 13 |
| 92 | 94 | 3 | |
| 106 | 1 | ||
| 213 | 1 | ||
| 219 | 225 | 7 | |
| 239 | 1 | ||
| 257 | 1 | ||
| 277 | 1 | ||
| 293 | 1 | ||
| 307 | 315 | 9 | |
| 330 | 1 | ||
| 42 | |||
Text of the short order is reproduced below:-
TASADDUQ HUSSAIN JILLANI CJ.- For reasons to be recorded later in the detailed judgment, we are persuaded to hold that the interpretation being accorded to rule 8.1 read with rule 8.12 of the Punjab Civil Service Pension rules vide the office memorandum issued by the Government of Punjab dated 22.10.2001 is not only violative of those Rules but also of Article 25 of Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. These appeals and petitions are therefore dismissed with no orders as to costs.
Special Thanks to Mr. Amir Agha (Canada).
aoa
I want guidance on the following:
my date of retirement is 17.01.2005
date of restoration 17.01.2017
I have not been allowed increases on commuted portion since 2005 on wards. Office of A.G. Punjab is of the opinion that increases are allowed to those who were party in the court proceedings. I solicit your opinion on this point , please.
My E. Mail address is [email protected]. my name is sanaullah
The jugment of SCP about the increase in the cumputer portion is not clear. Pl. let me know if this decion is applicable to those persons who retiered after 1.12.2001 or not.I am asking this question as there is case in LHC regarding this matter.Waiting your reply with intrest.
This increase is also for those who retiered after 1.12.2001?
I have read short jugment of SCP about the dismisal of appeals of GOP regarding the benefit of periodical increases on surrendered poetion of commuted value of pension after restoration.Pl. let me know if this decion is applicable to those persons who retired after 01.12.2001 or not. Thanks
kia Baldia kay employees jo 2001 say pelay retired howay hain wo double pension lay saktay hain ?
Dear Sooba yes.
i need full detailed decision of Supreme Court Regarding Grant of Increase in Pension on the Commuted Part of Pension, Upon Restoration of that Commuted Part.
Dear Ma’am, i need full detailed decision. Kindly help me in this regard.
Best Regards,
Mansoor Ijaz
Dear Mansoor, I ll get the copy of the decision soon. Just email me.
Is any one have detail order, please upload,
Dear Miraj as soon as i get the detailed order i ll publish the same at the site.
where can i find the full detailed decision ..kindly email me link
[email protected]
Dear,
Could you please help us in finding the detailed judgement of above short order by CH. Tassaduq Hussain Jillani in which ”
The Supreme Court has dismissed Appeals / Petitions of the Punjab Government Regarding Grant of Increase in Pension on the Commuted Part of Pension, Upon Restoration of that Commuted Part”
Thanks in anticipation of your best cooperation.
Best regards,
Pervaiz Ahmad,
Cell # 0300 66 786 40
Dear Pervaiz Ahmad, I have not yet received the copy of the same as soon as i get the updates i ll share at mine site Thanks
Madam kia ab punjub govt notification isue kar dy gie.
Dear Atta Rasool, Allah say dua karro, In Sha Allah zaroor Notification jaari hi jai ga.